Thank you for your careful work. An additional point that should be made. Women in pregnancy are not at noticeably greater risk of adverse events if infected by SARS-CoV-2.
So there is simply no reason even to offer them the dubious protection from “vaccination” that, as it turns out, do not work.
In the 60 years since thalidomide, we have never administered experimental medical treatments to pregnant women without first conducting a full battery of preclinical reproductive toxicology tests and seeing a clean profile. These data do not exist because those studies have not been done.
Thanks, Mike. I'm honored to have you as my very first commenter here.
Actually the Pfizer data packages submitted to Japan and Australia that have been released via FOIA request show problems with embryo attachment ("pre-implantation loss") and with birth defects among rats given the vaccine.
Specifically, the rate of pre-implantation loss was 9.8% compared to controls with 4.1%. And pups born to rats treated with the Pfizer vaccine were more likely to develop additional ribs ("supernumerary lumbar ribs"): 28.6% versus 14% in the control group.
Hi Mike, since you asked so nicely, here is a link, at least until g**gle decides it goes against their community standards and kills link sharing (wouldn't be the first time it's happened to me): https://tinyurl.com/biodist
While you're here, you really must read this post by a PhD in genomics about how a gene sequence from a Moderna patent submitted in 2012 (granted in 2018) found its way into the SARS-Cov-2 genome, which *might* have something to do with why the CEO seems to be freaking out:
"Pure coincidence" I'm sure. Just like Dr. Fauci asking DARPA for permission, according to Project Veritas, to investigate bat coronaviruses via gain-of-function research got denied just before Dr. Fauci's organization gave a grant to his good friend at EcoHealth Alliance who paid for that exact research in the same city where the coronavirus pandemic began, RIGHT. next to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. "Pure coincidence" like that pattern from Moderna being in the sequence.
Does their excuse for the rib problem even make sense? "The historical control data from CRL, France (Lyon) include two entries: one for supernumerary lumbar ribs with a
range of 0-5.3% for fetus and 0-22.7% for litter, and a second entry for thoracolumbar-full with range of 0-9.7% for
fetus and 0-50.0% for litter. The sponsor, based on clarification provided by the study authors, stated that
"supemwnerary lwnbar ribs" and "thoracolumbar, full" are two terms (in different versions of a preclinical software)
used for the same finding (DZJ-2058752). Therefore, historical control data range used for supernumerary lumbar ribs
in the table below is that stated for thoracolumbar-full in the study report (page 1102). Thus, the higher incidence of
supernumerary lumber ribs relative to the concurrent control group is not considered to be treatment-related."
It doesn't make sense to me. If you are doing an experiment, you don't go around comparing your outcomes to other studies. It's just another pharma trick.
There is another whole story about how that information was hidden in subsequent reports as the Australian regulator changed the pregnancy risk designation over time to make it appear safer.
I have a journalist friend who is writing it up. Drop me a line in a couple of weeks and if she has published it I'll send you the link. It will be in Hebrew but Goebbels Translate dose an adequate job these days. Or maybe I'll do a post on it.
I recall the DoD data reflecting a huge increase in infertility, which would probably include the very early failure of implantation.
An awful lot of attention to "older" or "unhealthier" vaccinees which I believe is a red herring in terms of fertility. By definition, this study looks at women of childbearing age and that implies a modicum of fitness. I also doubt Israeli women (vs American) are typically "obese" or "geriatric" at time of conception.
That is not good. I do not know enough about rats are as an animal model for human female fertility toxicology, but nothing about that is reassuring. Did the study provide any information regarding mechanism(s) of action?
No. And remember Pfizer claims the finding is not significant or meaningful, so what would be the rationale to explain mechanism(s) of action for something that doesn't exist--according to them?
Thank you too for your careful work too Dr. Mike Yadeon. I remember you reading the study in a video back in February 2021ish, way before nearly anyone else, about Lipidnano particles collecting in the placenta lining according to a document submitted to the Japanese regulatory agency and one other study title something about LNP: A warning to ____ also implying a 4 fold increase in antibodies that target a placenta cell or hormone following either LNP or mRNA vaccination from 2009? Something along those lines.
Thank you for the correction Dr. Yeadon. Yes, I didn't quite recall the exact specifics after the year or so since you spoke about it in your video. I knew one of the studies was from quite a while ago and the other more recent. Good to know and get a refresher on exactly what those antibodies are targeting too.
Out of curiosity, have you seen the latest trend/information being provided by embalmers regarding the dead they are working upon, increasingly having very large blood clots they have to remove in order to begin embalming? Supposedly beginning in roughly Q2 2021 and slowly increasing from ~30% of cases to 80% of cases they are seeing. One embalmer on Steve Kirsch's interview said 93% or 28 out of the last 30 patients she saw.
except "blood clot" is not really even the correct word. More like a giant obstruction which seems to be a white-gelatinous or rubber-like substance which does not perform like a blood clot. (Ex, applying pressure, as with with normal blood clotting, does not cause the material to reformulate into liquid form).
Do you have any theories/thoughts as to the cause or even what the material might be? I'm wondering if it is a mass of malformed proteins, now that the Cell article covered by Dr Robert Malone, has revealed mRNA in the blood can be malformed as often as 50% and remain at low but significant levels for up to 60 days post injection.
Ah, I suppose that could be it. Severe clotting leading to internal scabbing? Wow that would be something else. I noticed both John and the other embalmer who discussed this commented, they weren't sure how the person was able to let it get that bad. Stating, they must have been in severe pain prior to death or barely able to move (likely). This part confuses me a bit. Did they just avoid seeking medical help? All of them? and if they are seeking medical help?
Certainly at least some doctors should be sounding the alarm bells going "WHAT THE HECK IS THIS GIANT WHITE CLOT IN YOUR LEG?!" why am I seeing the often and as a consequence, these things being removed in surgery to save the patient?
Is the placenta being targeted by the body? If it is, could it be that all body parts such as the placenta, were actually genetic gifts from viruses, will be targeted by the body. What is the trigger?
I dunno - I've been getting more and more vocal about my dissent when speaking to covidian militant coworkers and acquaintances, and while my subdued skepticism of before was met with venom and bullying (in 2020 and 2021), these days my open hostility to the regime and my conviction that the demise of the narrative is imminent is sometimes being met with nervous shrugs and even tentative approval.
Some of these people just want to be part of what they think the majority is, and if you convince them the majority is soon to be against them (or already is), they (IME) respond better than they do to reason, evidence or analysis. Whether it's actually true or not.
Personally I'm choosing to be optimistic. Simply speaking (and posting) as though the reckoning is imminent might actually help manifest it. Worth a try?
So many governments are so heavily invested, so many medical staff have bullied people, entire systems are implicated in a health crime. They are not going to give up easily.
Thank you a lot for this work. Still, I would like to ask you - do you intend to submit it to some peer-reviewed journal or at least to MedXRiv as a preprint? Unfortunately, substack got a reputation as an "antivax" server so having this research in any peer-reviewed journlal or at least a preprint server indexed ny Medline would likely give it a biggger audience and better credibility - thus making it easier to use for all who battle this outrageous vaccination campaign...
This is very interesting, and as often the case, I have more questions than answers.
-Why only data from this hospital?
-What is potentially unusual about this hospital? The population it serves? Major center for high risk pregnancies?
-Are elective abortions without medical cause included in the dataset? If so, were elective abortions without medical causes excluded?
-What the hell happened in May? Was there a big shift in policy 9-11 months prior that could lead to such a spike in conceptions?
-Is the unvaccinated population in Israel disproportionately orthodox? If so, these women are much less likely to get elective abortions. How much could that account for the delta of 6% and 8%?
-Are datasets like this available from elsewhere in the world?
-How does the baseline rate of SBMA compare to the past 10-20 years?
Israel has world class scientists, researchers, mathematicians, technologists, clinicians, and intelligence capabilities. Furthermore, my understanding is Israel as a nation-state is concerned with increasing their Jew-ish population. Given this, obvious gaps and oversights in these datasets increases my weighing of probability of malfeasance > ignorance.
I am a cautious "hold" on making conclusions about any of this, and it definitely deserves more attention.
- Because this was the only hospital that responded to the FOIA request with the appropriate data. This is an important point: the ministry of health says it is tracking this carefully, though won't share it's data. The head of the birthing unit at the major hospital in Tel Aviv says he has looked at this thoroughly but will not share most of his data. And yet, when approached with FOIA requests, the Tel Aviv hospital and others say: we don't have information on the vaccination status of the pregnant women here unless they were vaccinated at the hospital. So they say they can't provide the asked-for information. If that's true, then how can the Tel Aviv hospital and the ministry of health say that they're following this and that they know there is no problem? Answer: they can't. Conclusion: they are lying.
- As far as we know, all abortions, spontaneous and planned, were included in the dataset. Because this is a hospital and not an abortion clinic, it's possible that a larger proportion of the planned abortions in the data are for medical necessity. Unfortunately we have no way of knowing.
- As far as we can tell nothing special happened in May. There was only a surge in SBMAs, not births. The average over the entire period was 396/month both live and SBMA. In May there were 392.
- The Orthodox and Arab populations are disproportionately unvaccinated. But their 'effect' on the results should be more or less constant through the period. Remember that the 6 vs 8 percent average is an average over a period that sees a great deal of volatility. My prior is that based on their lower socioeconomic status and, at least among the Arab population, less pre-natal care, that they would be at higher risk of pre-birth complications and involuntary early termination pregnancy. But you are correct that they would be less likely to get voluntary abortions, and that is a limitation with the data. However, as I pointed out, that would not really explain the volatility throughout the period.
- Not available as far as I know. This was obtained via FOIA.
- Unknown/not available
- I can assure you, based on the entirety of the behavior of the Israeli public health authorities over the course of the pandemic, including serial dishonesty and active hiding of crucial data, that this is an example of malfeasance.
Israel has world class scientists, researchers, mathematicians, technologists, clinicians, and intelligence capabilities. Furthermore, my understanding is Israel as a nation-state is concerned with increasing their Jew-ish population, meaning I presume "they" would want eyes on this. Given this, obvious gaps and oversights in these datasets increases my probability assessment of malfeasance > incompetence.
I am a cautious "hold" on making conclusions about any of this. It definitely deserves more attention.
Thank you for your diligence and thoroughness. This is amazing work and has been incredibly helpful to me in writing my own Substack post on Vaccine Injury. (I link to you in a couple places there, as your posts have some of the most valuable data and information available on this topic.)
Note that the 1, 2 and 3 doses are not mutually exclusive. So someone with a 3rd dose is also counted in the 2nd and 1st doses column. And someone with 2 doses is also counted in 1st dose column.
They should look at whether they got vaccinated before pregnancy or during pregnancy. May was probably the month with the most vaccinations during pregnancy.
Thank you for posting this. Could someone clarify whether "abortion" is referring to voluntary abortions, or whether it is a vague translation of "miscarriage," which is sometimes known as "spontaneous abortion?" We would need to correct for voluntary abortions if those are included in the data set.
Re: "[SBMA rate of] 8% among women who were vaccinated with at least one dose (and never had a SARS-Cov-2 infection)."
That 8% for the year seems low when looking at the first graph. I guess the 0% rates in January and February brought the average way down? Or am I missing something?
Probably. But you can't just added the rates. The overall percentage is going to be weighted towards months with more births overall, which may not be the months with high sbma rates. Haven't looked closely at it.
How significant is this as a "threat" to say the human race/depopulation? Does this relatively low increase debunk the depopulation myth because one generation made an extra absolute value of 6% more likely to abort result in zero effect?
I've heard from "conspiracy theories" this vaccination is intended to bring down the earth's population to ~500 million. This number comes directly from the book "The Great Reset" and is the author's ideal number of people the earth can support well and heal/be controlled/everyone live in a relative life of luxury.
However, I see above a rate from 6% to 12% at the worst-hospital for quantity of birthing-issues in absolute terms? This still means if I am reading this correct, 88% will still be successful and brought to term? If the goal was depopulation, a drop from 94% to 88% of births being successful seems minimal for one generation seems like it would never achieve that goal.
I don't know about depopulation. The 500k (edit: 500 million) number seems unworkably low if TPTB want to keep their luxurious lifestyle.
But there is another aspect to population dynamics that isn't captures in the data: how many women didn't get pregnant at all, and is it worse for the vaccinated? It's like the dog that didn't bark. Only noticeable in its absence.
Oh not 500k, I said 500 million. So basically, the population of the United States, Japan, UK and Canada combined roughly. To put that in perspective.
Well, maybe with respect to the women who didn't get pregnant. I guess you're talking about those trying to conceive and being unsuccessful due to say antibodies attacking the placenta? or the man's testicles haven taken the blunt of the LNP and being basically near-sterile?
Is it possible the spike protein racially specific and will it harm some in Israel but may not harm those with x linked K26R Ace2 receptors? Do you have any research on genetic specificity of the patented Sarscov2 spike protein? ( See research From Dr David Martin) and Ralph Baric/ Ft Dietrich /UNC evaluation and development of spike proteins not just its attachment via the ACE2 receptor but also the Furin and TMPRSS2 protease cleavage sites and the GP41 Tcell damage all likely triggered by the binding of the Racially sepecific ACE2 Receptor Binding Domain that seems to repel the K26R Ace2.
Just finished watching your interview at World Council for Health. THANK YOU for sounding the alarm for the silenced Israeli majority, especially where it concerns us women.
I also read Ori Xabi's FB post (Heb.) describing what he found in the FOIA documents... the half-baked data which he dragged kicking and screaming out of two of our best hospitals. Besides the alarming numbers, the really horrific fact was this (my translation):
"No systematic and orderly tracking and research was done by the two hospitals, in order to track the safety of the vaccines for pregnant women, in regard to stillbirths [and miscarriages]."
Our country used to be known for our cutting-edge research in FERTILITY treatments!!
And now we can't be bothered to track clear data signals warning of a possible fertility disaster??
Thank you for your careful work. An additional point that should be made. Women in pregnancy are not at noticeably greater risk of adverse events if infected by SARS-CoV-2.
So there is simply no reason even to offer them the dubious protection from “vaccination” that, as it turns out, do not work.
In the 60 years since thalidomide, we have never administered experimental medical treatments to pregnant women without first conducting a full battery of preclinical reproductive toxicology tests and seeing a clean profile. These data do not exist because those studies have not been done.
Thanks, Mike. I'm honored to have you as my very first commenter here.
Actually the Pfizer data packages submitted to Japan and Australia that have been released via FOIA request show problems with embryo attachment ("pre-implantation loss") and with birth defects among rats given the vaccine.
Specifically, the rate of pre-implantation loss was 9.8% compared to controls with 4.1%. And pups born to rats treated with the Pfizer vaccine were more likely to develop additional ribs ("supernumerary lumbar ribs"): 28.6% versus 14% in the control group.
I too would value a link to that if you can post it, because that makes sharing it simple.
Receiving a pdf makes sharing difficult as it has first to be posted online 🤗
Hi Mike, since you asked so nicely, here is a link, at least until g**gle decides it goes against their community standards and kills link sharing (wouldn't be the first time it's happened to me): https://tinyurl.com/biodist
While you're here, you really must read this post by a PhD in genomics about how a gene sequence from a Moderna patent submitted in 2012 (granted in 2018) found its way into the SARS-Cov-2 genome, which *might* have something to do with why the CEO seems to be freaking out:
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/how-to-blast-your-way-to-the-truth
"Pure coincidence" I'm sure. Just like Dr. Fauci asking DARPA for permission, according to Project Veritas, to investigate bat coronaviruses via gain-of-function research got denied just before Dr. Fauci's organization gave a grant to his good friend at EcoHealth Alliance who paid for that exact research in the same city where the coronavirus pandemic began, RIGHT. next to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. "Pure coincidence" like that pattern from Moderna being in the sequence.
Forgot to say the data I mentioned are in section 6
Do you have that link handy? I don't have that one in my documentation, but I need to.
I don't have a link but I'll send you the document.
Does their excuse for the rib problem even make sense? "The historical control data from CRL, France (Lyon) include two entries: one for supernumerary lumbar ribs with a
range of 0-5.3% for fetus and 0-22.7% for litter, and a second entry for thoracolumbar-full with range of 0-9.7% for
fetus and 0-50.0% for litter. The sponsor, based on clarification provided by the study authors, stated that
"supemwnerary lwnbar ribs" and "thoracolumbar, full" are two terms (in different versions of a preclinical software)
used for the same finding (DZJ-2058752). Therefore, historical control data range used for supernumerary lumbar ribs
in the table below is that stated for thoracolumbar-full in the study report (page 1102). Thus, the higher incidence of
supernumerary lumber ribs relative to the concurrent control group is not considered to be treatment-related."
It doesn't make sense to me. If you are doing an experiment, you don't go around comparing your outcomes to other studies. It's just another pharma trick.
There is another whole story about how that information was hidden in subsequent reports as the Australian regulator changed the pregnancy risk designation over time to make it appear safer.
Wowzer! Where can I read about the Australian regulation change?
I have a journalist friend who is writing it up. Drop me a line in a couple of weeks and if she has published it I'll send you the link. It will be in Hebrew but Goebbels Translate dose an adequate job these days. Or maybe I'll do a post on it.
Can you send the link to your journalist friends story or did you perhaps do a post on it. I’m in Australia so interested in TGA shenanigans
I recall the DoD data reflecting a huge increase in infertility, which would probably include the very early failure of implantation.
An awful lot of attention to "older" or "unhealthier" vaccinees which I believe is a red herring in terms of fertility. By definition, this study looks at women of childbearing age and that implies a modicum of fitness. I also doubt Israeli women (vs American) are typically "obese" or "geriatric" at time of conception.
That is not good. I do not know enough about rats are as an animal model for human female fertility toxicology, but nothing about that is reassuring. Did the study provide any information regarding mechanism(s) of action?
No. And remember Pfizer claims the finding is not significant or meaningful, so what would be the rationale to explain mechanism(s) of action for something that doesn't exist--according to them?
Thank you too for your careful work too Dr. Mike Yadeon. I remember you reading the study in a video back in February 2021ish, way before nearly anyone else, about Lipidnano particles collecting in the placenta lining according to a document submitted to the Japanese regulatory agency and one other study title something about LNP: A warning to ____ also implying a 4 fold increase in antibodies that target a placenta cell or hormone following either LNP or mRNA vaccination from 2009? Something along those lines.
Wesley, yes, that’s broadly right. The industry knew that lipid nano particles accumulate in ovaries 2012 or earlier.
Additionally a paper in 2021 shows vaccinated women raise antibodies to a critical protein in their placenta.
All c19 vaccines should be contraindicated for any pregnant women.
They are too dangerous to use in anyone, actually, and they don’t work.
Thank you for the correction Dr. Yeadon. Yes, I didn't quite recall the exact specifics after the year or so since you spoke about it in your video. I knew one of the studies was from quite a while ago and the other more recent. Good to know and get a refresher on exactly what those antibodies are targeting too.
Out of curiosity, have you seen the latest trend/information being provided by embalmers regarding the dead they are working upon, increasingly having very large blood clots they have to remove in order to begin embalming? Supposedly beginning in roughly Q2 2021 and slowly increasing from ~30% of cases to 80% of cases they are seeing. One embalmer on Steve Kirsch's interview said 93% or 28 out of the last 30 patients she saw.
Yes, I’m now a friend of John O’Looney of uk & have heard quite a bit from the whole post death scene.
except "blood clot" is not really even the correct word. More like a giant obstruction which seems to be a white-gelatinous or rubber-like substance which does not perform like a blood clot. (Ex, applying pressure, as with with normal blood clotting, does not cause the material to reformulate into liquid form).
Do you have any theories/thoughts as to the cause or even what the material might be? I'm wondering if it is a mass of malformed proteins, now that the Cell article covered by Dr Robert Malone, has revealed mRNA in the blood can be malformed as often as 50% and remain at low but significant levels for up to 60 days post injection.
I think this might be consolidated clotting. It’s a complex cascade of proteins taking all the way from soft clots, to a tough material of a scab.
In truth, I’m not sure & give way to pathologists.
Ah, I suppose that could be it. Severe clotting leading to internal scabbing? Wow that would be something else. I noticed both John and the other embalmer who discussed this commented, they weren't sure how the person was able to let it get that bad. Stating, they must have been in severe pain prior to death or barely able to move (likely). This part confuses me a bit. Did they just avoid seeking medical help? All of them? and if they are seeking medical help?
Certainly at least some doctors should be sounding the alarm bells going "WHAT THE HECK IS THIS GIANT WHITE CLOT IN YOUR LEG?!" why am I seeing the often and as a consequence, these things being removed in surgery to save the patient?
It’s possible that some of the changes occurred after death. I too struggle with the idea that these structures where fully formed during life.
Is the placenta being targeted by the body? If it is, could it be that all body parts such as the placenta, were actually genetic gifts from viruses, will be targeted by the body. What is the trigger?
The FOIA requests are breaking this dam open.
Maybe in a few weeks we won't feel like dissidents again?
Sure we will. The militants will see us selfishly untouched by vax harm. After the realization, resentment will follow.
I dunno - I've been getting more and more vocal about my dissent when speaking to covidian militant coworkers and acquaintances, and while my subdued skepticism of before was met with venom and bullying (in 2020 and 2021), these days my open hostility to the regime and my conviction that the demise of the narrative is imminent is sometimes being met with nervous shrugs and even tentative approval.
Some of these people just want to be part of what they think the majority is, and if you convince them the majority is soon to be against them (or already is), they (IME) respond better than they do to reason, evidence or analysis. Whether it's actually true or not.
Personally I'm choosing to be optimistic. Simply speaking (and posting) as though the reckoning is imminent might actually help manifest it. Worth a try?
A friend reminded me of this.
https://t.co/Vx1dkZIRfH
So many governments are so heavily invested, so many medical staff have bullied people, entire systems are implicated in a health crime. They are not going to give up easily.
Thank you a lot for this work. Still, I would like to ask you - do you intend to submit it to some peer-reviewed journal or at least to MedXRiv as a preprint? Unfortunately, substack got a reputation as an "antivax" server so having this research in any peer-reviewed journlal or at least a preprint server indexed ny Medline would likely give it a biggger audience and better credibility - thus making it easier to use for all who battle this outrageous vaccination campaign...
This is a great idea. I'm super busy with another project that is at a higher priority for me right now. Would you like to help me write it up?
This is very interesting, and as often the case, I have more questions than answers.
-Why only data from this hospital?
-What is potentially unusual about this hospital? The population it serves? Major center for high risk pregnancies?
-Are elective abortions without medical cause included in the dataset? If so, were elective abortions without medical causes excluded?
-What the hell happened in May? Was there a big shift in policy 9-11 months prior that could lead to such a spike in conceptions?
-Is the unvaccinated population in Israel disproportionately orthodox? If so, these women are much less likely to get elective abortions. How much could that account for the delta of 6% and 8%?
-Are datasets like this available from elsewhere in the world?
-How does the baseline rate of SBMA compare to the past 10-20 years?
Israel has world class scientists, researchers, mathematicians, technologists, clinicians, and intelligence capabilities. Furthermore, my understanding is Israel as a nation-state is concerned with increasing their Jew-ish population. Given this, obvious gaps and oversights in these datasets increases my weighing of probability of malfeasance > ignorance.
I am a cautious "hold" on making conclusions about any of this, and it definitely deserves more attention.
Will try to answer your questions:
- Because this was the only hospital that responded to the FOIA request with the appropriate data. This is an important point: the ministry of health says it is tracking this carefully, though won't share it's data. The head of the birthing unit at the major hospital in Tel Aviv says he has looked at this thoroughly but will not share most of his data. And yet, when approached with FOIA requests, the Tel Aviv hospital and others say: we don't have information on the vaccination status of the pregnant women here unless they were vaccinated at the hospital. So they say they can't provide the asked-for information. If that's true, then how can the Tel Aviv hospital and the ministry of health say that they're following this and that they know there is no problem? Answer: they can't. Conclusion: they are lying.
- As far as we know, all abortions, spontaneous and planned, were included in the dataset. Because this is a hospital and not an abortion clinic, it's possible that a larger proportion of the planned abortions in the data are for medical necessity. Unfortunately we have no way of knowing.
- As far as we can tell nothing special happened in May. There was only a surge in SBMAs, not births. The average over the entire period was 396/month both live and SBMA. In May there were 392.
- The Orthodox and Arab populations are disproportionately unvaccinated. But their 'effect' on the results should be more or less constant through the period. Remember that the 6 vs 8 percent average is an average over a period that sees a great deal of volatility. My prior is that based on their lower socioeconomic status and, at least among the Arab population, less pre-natal care, that they would be at higher risk of pre-birth complications and involuntary early termination pregnancy. But you are correct that they would be less likely to get voluntary abortions, and that is a limitation with the data. However, as I pointed out, that would not really explain the volatility throughout the period.
- Not available as far as I know. This was obtained via FOIA.
- Unknown/not available
- I can assure you, based on the entirety of the behavior of the Israeli public health authorities over the course of the pandemic, including serial dishonesty and active hiding of crucial data, that this is an example of malfeasance.
Israel has world class scientists, researchers, mathematicians, technologists, clinicians, and intelligence capabilities. Furthermore, my understanding is Israel as a nation-state is concerned with increasing their Jew-ish population, meaning I presume "they" would want eyes on this. Given this, obvious gaps and oversights in these datasets increases my probability assessment of malfeasance > incompetence.
I am a cautious "hold" on making conclusions about any of this. It definitely deserves more attention.
They’re going to find out that they fucked up and they’re going to lose their country to Palestine.
Thank you for your diligence and thoroughness. This is amazing work and has been incredibly helpful to me in writing my own Substack post on Vaccine Injury. (I link to you in a couple places there, as your posts have some of the most valuable data and information available on this topic.)
The link https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fge_lBpcq7ZCHVa-x-MhnJ4MB7yhCRY- gives 3 excel spreadsheets. I analysed the 3rd excel file but translation from Hebrew to English is problematic!
Within that 3rd Excel file there are 3 data sets. I analysed each individually; then collated the data, and analysed as one data set.
Are they the same hospital or different?
Also, one column states AUTHENTICATED but no other description, what is that?
Another column translates as RECOVERING NO. IMMUNE. Is that the number of previously infected but not vaccinated?
The results I got looked pretty horrendous.
Are the different Excel files all different hospitals?
Thanks...
Hi, here is a link to a spreadsheet with English translation: https://tinyurl.com/ILHospData
Note that the 1, 2 and 3 doses are not mutually exclusive. So someone with a 3rd dose is also counted in the 2nd and 1st doses column. And someone with 2 doses is also counted in 1st dose column.
They should look at whether they got vaccinated before pregnancy or during pregnancy. May was probably the month with the most vaccinations during pregnancy.
Yes, they definitely should. Will they? Doubt it.
When a woman got vaccinated in pregnancy is very important to consider. See: https://inumero.substack.com/p/vaccination-and-pregnancy-in-the?r=tv61s&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
another thing that should be look at is temporal relationship between vaccine and effects as well as dosage
Yes if only we had the data!
Don't we need the data broken out without abortions since abortion is a choice?
See footnote 2
Thank you for posting this. Could someone clarify whether "abortion" is referring to voluntary abortions, or whether it is a vague translation of "miscarriage," which is sometimes known as "spontaneous abortion?" We would need to correct for voluntary abortions if those are included in the data set.
See footnote 2.
Wow, almost 45% stillbirths/MC/A for the month of May, 2021. That's huge! Screams out for an investigation.
Re: "[SBMA rate of] 8% among women who were vaccinated with at least one dose (and never had a SARS-Cov-2 infection)."
That 8% for the year seems low when looking at the first graph. I guess the 0% rates in January and February brought the average way down? Or am I missing something?
Probably. But you can't just added the rates. The overall percentage is going to be weighted towards months with more births overall, which may not be the months with high sbma rates. Haven't looked closely at it.
How significant is this as a "threat" to say the human race/depopulation? Does this relatively low increase debunk the depopulation myth because one generation made an extra absolute value of 6% more likely to abort result in zero effect?
I've heard from "conspiracy theories" this vaccination is intended to bring down the earth's population to ~500 million. This number comes directly from the book "The Great Reset" and is the author's ideal number of people the earth can support well and heal/be controlled/everyone live in a relative life of luxury.
However, I see above a rate from 6% to 12% at the worst-hospital for quantity of birthing-issues in absolute terms? This still means if I am reading this correct, 88% will still be successful and brought to term? If the goal was depopulation, a drop from 94% to 88% of births being successful seems minimal for one generation seems like it would never achieve that goal.
I don't know about depopulation. The 500k (edit: 500 million) number seems unworkably low if TPTB want to keep their luxurious lifestyle.
But there is another aspect to population dynamics that isn't captures in the data: how many women didn't get pregnant at all, and is it worse for the vaccinated? It's like the dog that didn't bark. Only noticeable in its absence.
Oh not 500k, I said 500 million. So basically, the population of the United States, Japan, UK and Canada combined roughly. To put that in perspective.
Well, maybe with respect to the women who didn't get pregnant. I guess you're talking about those trying to conceive and being unsuccessful due to say antibodies attacking the placenta? or the man's testicles haven taken the blunt of the LNP and being basically near-sterile?
Thanks for sharing this important analysis and for avoiding the temptation to overstate. I think this qualitatively aligns with one of the observations made by Pantazatos in this paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
"The euromomo.eu
data also reveal an unexpected increase in mortality in children (which are unvaccinated) with
adult vaccination rates in the previous period. It is notable that this indirect adverse vaccination
effect was independently observed in both CDC and euromomo.eu datasets. The majority of
deaths <18 years age occur in infants <1 years..."
I may be trying to draw a connection that's invalid, but these observations seem to fit.
Than you yes I am familiar with that paper.
This is really great analysis!
I saw Malone around a couple months ago (b4 he was kicked off twitter) mentioned this article on fertility: https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/is-there-plausible-basis-for-fertility
Is it possible the spike protein racially specific and will it harm some in Israel but may not harm those with x linked K26R Ace2 receptors? Do you have any research on genetic specificity of the patented Sarscov2 spike protein? ( See research From Dr David Martin) and Ralph Baric/ Ft Dietrich /UNC evaluation and development of spike proteins not just its attachment via the ACE2 receptor but also the Furin and TMPRSS2 protease cleavage sites and the GP41 Tcell damage all likely triggered by the binding of the Racially sepecific ACE2 Receptor Binding Domain that seems to repel the K26R Ace2.
No idea, sorry.
Just finished watching your interview at World Council for Health. THANK YOU for sounding the alarm for the silenced Israeli majority, especially where it concerns us women.
I also read Ori Xabi's FB post (Heb.) describing what he found in the FOIA documents... the half-baked data which he dragged kicking and screaming out of two of our best hospitals. Besides the alarming numbers, the really horrific fact was this (my translation):
"No systematic and orderly tracking and research was done by the two hospitals, in order to track the safety of the vaccines for pregnant women, in regard to stillbirths [and miscarriages]."
Our country used to be known for our cutting-edge research in FERTILITY treatments!!
And now we can't be bothered to track clear data signals warning of a possible fertility disaster??
How the mighty have fallen...