This is wonderful evidence, what slacker dirtbags these "watch dogs" are. Tar and feather is my first vote but this is a powerful contender, go you!! FOIA requests are my absolute favorites because it's always a goodie bag of waste, fraud and abuse of power that thrives in the darkness of the Federal bureaucracy. Big time kudos & thanks let's see FOIA fires shining light all over the swamp creatures!!
These finding corroborate that CDC is not a public health agency.
CDC is one of the core agencies within HHS running the US Government’s domestic bioterrorism program to maim and kill as many Americans as possible with impunity.
COVID-19 is NOT a government-run public health program.
It's also NOT a public health program that's fallen under regulatory capture by profiteering pharmaceutical corporations.
HHS (FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID), Dept. of Defense, Dept. Homeland Security, Dept of Justice are all involved in the bioterrorism program. It’s funded by taxpayers, authorized by Congress and US presidents.
There’s lots of medical evidence supporting this conclusion, from doctors treating patients, censorship, treatment suppression. There’s lots of scientific evidence from people digging up past published research and patents of Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi, etc. There’s lots of data from databases like VAERS, DMED, from the Pfizer documents released through the PHMPT FOIA case, and from millions of peoples’ personal observations of their own experiences, and family and friends’ experiences, about severe adverse effects and deaths.
I've been compiling the LEGAL evidence - statutes, regulations, executive orders, declarations, court cases, FDA guidance documents.
In 1997, Congress passed two laws within three days of each other.
Nov. 18 - National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), adding protections to the rights of military personnel to refuse participation in chemical and biological weapons experiments (response to public outrage about injuries and deaths of military personnel forced to take ANTHRAX vaccines during and after 1991 Gulf War)
Nov. 21 - FDA Modernization Act - Amendment to Food Drug and Cosmetics Act to create the EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION program and establish the entire American population as pool of human subjects for experimental use of chemical and biological weapons under "public health emergency" declarations by HHS Secretary, which automatically revoked informed consent rights.
EFFECT: Transferred operations and funding for the US Chemical and Biological Warfare Program from 50 USC Chapter 32 (the Department of Defense) to 21 USC Chapter 9 (The Food and Drug Administration of the Dept. of Health and Human Services), and expanded it.
In 2004, Congress nullified informed consent principles through the EUA program, when they passed Project Bioshield Act.
See 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii) waiving informed consent for unapproved products (2004); 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(2)(A) waiving informed consent for unapproved use of an approved product (2004).
The statutes include language that HHS Secretary may set conditions on EUAs that recipients be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product,” which appears to protect a meaningful option to refuse, thus upholding the principle of informed consent as framed by the Nuremberg Code.
However, the Department of Justice and at least one federal judge have interpreted the “consequences of refusal” to mean that recipients may be told by the person demanding that they accept the product, that if they refuse, they will be disciplined, fired or lose their place at school, thus legalizing coercive medical treatment in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
US government also voided “Good Clinical Practices” laws — the contracts for the kill-shots are military prototype contracts for “large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstrations” run through DOD/BARDA:
Congress also authorized use of ‘real world evidence’ in FDA regulatory procedures, meaning distributing experimental products to public at large first, without prior valid clinical data on safety and efficacy, and collecting data about effects afterward, through private databases and health registries.
Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 2013, Vol. 14, No. 3: 590-610
11 Pages
- Donald W. Light
Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine ; Center for Migration and Development; Institute for Advanced Study
- Joel Lexchin
York University
- Jonathan J. Darrow
Harvard Medical School
Date Written: June 1, 2013
Abstract
Over the past 35 years, patients have suffered from a largely hidden epidemic of side effects from drugs that usually have few offsetting benefits. The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created. Since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised Congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs. The authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA’s prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency. Industry has demanded shorter average review times and, with less time to thoroughly review evidence, increased hospitalizations and deaths have resulted. Meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of patients. Unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate. We offer practical suggestions including: separating the funding of clinical trials from their conduct, analysis, and publication: independent FDA leadership; full public funding for all FDA activities; measures to discourage R&D on drugs with few if any new clinical benefits; and the creation of a National Drug Safety Board.
Where's the congressional oversight?! I'm not optimistic that a change of parties would change that, either. Major players in both parties are bought and paid for.
Thank you sir for your diligence and for staying on top of this! This was great research work. You really knew how to go about it in such a way that yielded lots of answers, sadly they are not the answers that should be coming from a proper medical study but I am so thankful you are exposing them. God bless you
HHS did the same. They were supposed to conduct regular surveillance of the childhood vaccine program after the 1986 Act, but they never did. For over 30 years! Important evidence that the system is broken. Add to this, that under EUA, all providers become mandated reporters to VAERS for all AE's regardless of whether they think it was vax related, but NO ONE WAS INFORMED about this legal requirement. How hard would it be to make sure your training on a novel medical intervention included your obligation to document and report all reactions? They didn't want to know, simple as that.
Geez. Every time I figure the FOSness of the CDC has bottomed out, they plumb to new depths. I think back to a time when I posted some (I thought) disturbing data from VAERS, and one of my followers said something along the lines, "...well, there are a lot of false records in VAERS." Or words to that effect. Now we see that the CDC did not even CONSULT VAERS. Then again, why would they? One of their chief funders--Pfizer--was busy lying to the FDA, spending all that loot from the various state governments and laughing all the way to the bank. Nice work if you can get it!
How could anyone be following this and not be indignantly and overwhelmingly nauseous? What these government actors have been doing is a grotesque charade of regulatory oversight.
It seems a comment was deleted here that I just found in my inbox. It was from Jordan and read: " A friend of mine, a CDC apologist, points out that the briefing doc is listed as a "draft" for "internal use" which is "subject to change without notice". Since it's just a draft, he maintains, the CDC was not lying when it conceded it did no PRRs. Do you see any credence in this line of defense?"
My reply is that they revised the document in Feb 2022. It is also written that it is subject to change without notice, but they say that they are still going to calculate PRRs. So apparently they didn't change that plan in the preceding year:
That is the reason why they did not follow up on a complaint that I made from Buenos Aires in the Pfizer clinical trial and they never followed up... a shame
I've just received yesterday a FOIA response following a request I submitted to the CDC a few months ago. In an email dated on 19 october 2021 from Martha Sharan to John Su / Tom Shimabukuro, she states that she just explained to a journalist that the CDC doesn't use PPR (there is a typo, it's PRR)
"It's just been proved that the big state body in the USA which was supposed to be monitoring Covid vaccine safety didn't bother. It lied. Someone just did a Freedom of Information request to see the monitoring records - they're not there. You have to wonder - what's going on? Looking like some kind of fraud."
Bravo! Something that bothers me so much about the CDC, is that when they recommend a treatment modality, or claim that it is safe, MD’s( and I know because I am one) use that info like the holy grail for treating patients. As a matter of fact, if you DONT treat patients according to CDC guidelines, as a physician, you are liable to lawsuit. That’s just the way it is. Malpractice attorneys will ask why you did not follow the recommended CDC guidelines, if you did not and there is a bad outcome. So they have SO much power, and yet this is the shoddy way they protect the most vulnerable? It has become clear to me that the CDC does what big pharma wants, but so many physicians don’t dig in to find the truth, they just trust the CDC.
BRILLIANT!!!!!!!! Going right into my latest substack. THANK YOU.
Well done! 🙌
This is wonderful evidence, what slacker dirtbags these "watch dogs" are. Tar and feather is my first vote but this is a powerful contender, go you!! FOIA requests are my absolute favorites because it's always a goodie bag of waste, fraud and abuse of power that thrives in the darkness of the Federal bureaucracy. Big time kudos & thanks let's see FOIA fires shining light all over the swamp creatures!!
I guess I should be shocked but just more business as usual. Only when people start going to jail will things change.
These finding corroborate that CDC is not a public health agency.
CDC is one of the core agencies within HHS running the US Government’s domestic bioterrorism program to maim and kill as many Americans as possible with impunity.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program
COVID-19 is NOT a government-run public health program.
It's also NOT a public health program that's fallen under regulatory capture by profiteering pharmaceutical corporations.
HHS (FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID), Dept. of Defense, Dept. Homeland Security, Dept of Justice are all involved in the bioterrorism program. It’s funded by taxpayers, authorized by Congress and US presidents.
There’s lots of medical evidence supporting this conclusion, from doctors treating patients, censorship, treatment suppression. There’s lots of scientific evidence from people digging up past published research and patents of Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi, etc. There’s lots of data from databases like VAERS, DMED, from the Pfizer documents released through the PHMPT FOIA case, and from millions of peoples’ personal observations of their own experiences, and family and friends’ experiences, about severe adverse effects and deaths.
I've been compiling the LEGAL evidence - statutes, regulations, executive orders, declarations, court cases, FDA guidance documents.
In 1997, Congress passed two laws within three days of each other.
Nov. 18 - National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), adding protections to the rights of military personnel to refuse participation in chemical and biological weapons experiments (response to public outrage about injuries and deaths of military personnel forced to take ANTHRAX vaccines during and after 1991 Gulf War)
Nov. 21 - FDA Modernization Act - Amendment to Food Drug and Cosmetics Act to create the EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION program and establish the entire American population as pool of human subjects for experimental use of chemical and biological weapons under "public health emergency" declarations by HHS Secretary, which automatically revoked informed consent rights.
EFFECT: Transferred operations and funding for the US Chemical and Biological Warfare Program from 50 USC Chapter 32 (the Department of Defense) to 21 USC Chapter 9 (The Food and Drug Administration of the Dept. of Health and Human Services), and expanded it.
In 2004, Congress nullified informed consent principles through the EUA program, when they passed Project Bioshield Act.
See 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii) waiving informed consent for unapproved products (2004); 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(2)(A) waiving informed consent for unapproved use of an approved product (2004).
The statutes include language that HHS Secretary may set conditions on EUAs that recipients be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product,” which appears to protect a meaningful option to refuse, thus upholding the principle of informed consent as framed by the Nuremberg Code.
However, the Department of Justice and at least one federal judge have interpreted the “consequences of refusal” to mean that recipients may be told by the person demanding that they accept the product, that if they refuse, they will be disciplined, fired or lose their place at school, thus legalizing coercive medical treatment in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
US government also voided “Good Clinical Practices” laws — the contracts for the kill-shots are military prototype contracts for “large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstrations” run through DOD/BARDA:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/implications-of-10-usc-2371b-the
Congress also authorized use of ‘real world evidence’ in FDA regulatory procedures, meaning distributing experimental products to public at large first, without prior valid clinical data on safety and efficacy, and collecting data about effects afterward, through private databases and health registries.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/faked-clinical-trials-and-real-world
This paper is from 2013 but it's a great history of FDA's failure to protect American citizens over time.
11 pages but I found it a quick read.
Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2282014
Download PDF (11 pages)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2305519_code896345.pdf?abstractid=2282014&mirid=1
Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 2013, Vol. 14, No. 3: 590-610
11 Pages
- Donald W. Light
Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine ; Center for Migration and Development; Institute for Advanced Study
- Joel Lexchin
York University
- Jonathan J. Darrow
Harvard Medical School
Date Written: June 1, 2013
Abstract
Over the past 35 years, patients have suffered from a largely hidden epidemic of side effects from drugs that usually have few offsetting benefits. The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created. Since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised Congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs. The authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA’s prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency. Industry has demanded shorter average review times and, with less time to thoroughly review evidence, increased hospitalizations and deaths have resulted. Meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of patients. Unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate. We offer practical suggestions including: separating the funding of clinical trials from their conduct, analysis, and publication: independent FDA leadership; full public funding for all FDA activities; measures to discourage R&D on drugs with few if any new clinical benefits; and the creation of a National Drug Safety Board.
Thank you! I actually met Donald Light several times when I was in graduate school but at the time I was not focused on these issues.
Wow! Impressive !
Where's the congressional oversight?! I'm not optimistic that a change of parties would change that, either. Major players in both parties are bought and paid for.
Thank you sir for your diligence and for staying on top of this! This was great research work. You really knew how to go about it in such a way that yielded lots of answers, sadly they are not the answers that should be coming from a proper medical study but I am so thankful you are exposing them. God bless you
Shouldn't the CDC admitting that the entire surveillance scheme was complete fiction be a much bigger bombshell??!!! Amazing how far we have fallen...
HHS did the same. They were supposed to conduct regular surveillance of the childhood vaccine program after the 1986 Act, but they never did. For over 30 years! Important evidence that the system is broken. Add to this, that under EUA, all providers become mandated reporters to VAERS for all AE's regardless of whether they think it was vax related, but NO ONE WAS INFORMED about this legal requirement. How hard would it be to make sure your training on a novel medical intervention included your obligation to document and report all reactions? They didn't want to know, simple as that.
Geez. Every time I figure the FOSness of the CDC has bottomed out, they plumb to new depths. I think back to a time when I posted some (I thought) disturbing data from VAERS, and one of my followers said something along the lines, "...well, there are a lot of false records in VAERS." Or words to that effect. Now we see that the CDC did not even CONSULT VAERS. Then again, why would they? One of their chief funders--Pfizer--was busy lying to the FDA, spending all that loot from the various state governments and laughing all the way to the bank. Nice work if you can get it!
How could anyone be following this and not be indignantly and overwhelmingly nauseous? What these government actors have been doing is a grotesque charade of regulatory oversight.
It seems a comment was deleted here that I just found in my inbox. It was from Jordan and read: " A friend of mine, a CDC apologist, points out that the briefing doc is listed as a "draft" for "internal use" which is "subject to change without notice". Since it's just a draft, he maintains, the CDC was not lying when it conceded it did no PRRs. Do you see any credence in this line of defense?"
My reply is that they revised the document in Feb 2022. It is also written that it is subject to change without notice, but they say that they are still going to calculate PRRs. So apparently they didn't change that plan in the preceding year:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/VAERS-COVID19-SOP-02-02-2022-508.pdf
Furthermore, the Epoch Times recently received a response from John Wu at the CDC stating that they have been conducting PRR's since Feb, 2021: https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-cdc-says-it-performed-vaccine-safety-data-mining-after-saying-it-didnt_4617563.html
Good sleuthing, Jack!
That is the reason why they did not follow up on a complaint that I made from Buenos Aires in the Pfizer clinical trial and they never followed up... a shame
I learned about your story a few days ago. A travesty!
Hi.
I've just received yesterday a FOIA response following a request I submitted to the CDC a few months ago. In an email dated on 19 october 2021 from Martha Sharan to John Su / Tom Shimabukuro, she states that she just explained to a journalist that the CDC doesn't use PPR (there is a typo, it's PRR)
I would love to hear more about your FOIA request and see that email. Can you please contact me? joshg99 at gmail dot com
You've got an email.
This is great stuff, but how to break it down into a bite-sized chunk the average pro-vaxxer can immediately grasp..?
"It's just been proved that the big state body in the USA which was supposed to be monitoring Covid vaccine safety didn't bother. It lied. Someone just did a Freedom of Information request to see the monitoring records - they're not there. You have to wonder - what's going on? Looking like some kind of fraud."
Bravo! Something that bothers me so much about the CDC, is that when they recommend a treatment modality, or claim that it is safe, MD’s( and I know because I am one) use that info like the holy grail for treating patients. As a matter of fact, if you DONT treat patients according to CDC guidelines, as a physician, you are liable to lawsuit. That’s just the way it is. Malpractice attorneys will ask why you did not follow the recommended CDC guidelines, if you did not and there is a bad outcome. So they have SO much power, and yet this is the shoddy way they protect the most vulnerable? It has become clear to me that the CDC does what big pharma wants, but so many physicians don’t dig in to find the truth, they just trust the CDC.